CPU rate is too high
The per-CPU price may make otherwise compatible deployments more expensive than competing provider bids.
An Akash provider can be fully compatible with a workload and still lose the lease when its calculated bid exceeds competing providers or the tenant's budget.
Run the free provider checkPricing matters only after the workload is compatible. CPU, memory, storage and endpoint rates must remain competitive while still covering operating costs.
The per-CPU price may make otherwise compatible deployments more expensive than competing provider bids.
Large-memory workloads can produce uncompetitive totals when the memory rate is set too aggressively.
Ephemeral, persistent, SSD or NVMe pricing may push the total bid above the tenant's acceptable range.
A pricing script may enforce minimum totals or resource rates that automatically exclude smaller deployments.
Incorrect units, environment variables, conversion factors or resource calculations can inflate every bid.
A rate that previously won leases may become uncompetitive as more providers enter the market or lower their prices.
Compare the calculated bid, pricing-script inputs, minimum rates, requested resources and competing market prices before changing provider settings.
Run the free check, review the results and submit the failed items when you need help diagnosing lease declines or provider readiness.
Run the free Akash provider check